<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
  <channel>
    <title>weapons &amp;mdash; G A N Z E E R . T O D A Y</title>
    <link>https://ganzeer.today/tag:weapons</link>
    <description></description>
    <pubDate>Sat, 18 Apr 2026 01:47:03 +0000</pubDate>
    
    <item>
      <title>Antimatter Engine</title>
      <link>https://ganzeer.today/antimatter-engine?pk_campaign=rss-feed</link>
      <description>&lt;![CDATA[&#34;Just one gram of antimatter could generate an explosion equivalent to a nuclear bomb. It&#39;s that kind of energy, some say, that could boldly take us where no one has gone before at record speed.&#34;&#xA;&#xA;It could also--and, if history has taught us anything, probably will--do other things.&#xA;&#xA;&#34;An antimatter engine could theoretically accelerate a spacecraft at 1g (9.8 meters per second squared) getting us to Proxima in just five years... That&#39;s 8,000 times faster than it would take Voyager 1 — one of the fastest spacecraft in history — to travel about half the distance, according to NASA.&#xA;&#xA;&#34;Even within our own solar system, an antimatter-powered spacecraft could reach Pluto in 3.5 weeks compared to the 9.5 years it took NASA&#39;s New Horizons probe to arrive.&#xA;&#xA;&#34;The engine system would first gather high-energy positrons from krypton-79 and then direct them toward a layer of regular matter, producing annihilation energy.&#34;&#xA;&#xA;Annihilation energy.&#xA;&#xA;But apparently, this is all in fact pretty old science:&#xA;&#xA;&#34;In 1953, Austrian physicist Eugen Sänger proposed a &#34;photon rocket&#34; that would run on positron annihilation energy.&#34;&#xA;&#xA;The hurdle seems to be: (a) Funding, and (b) Testing. Regarding the latter, one has to be very careful where to go about testing &#34;annihilation&#34; energy apparently. One scientist has a remarkably bright idea though:&#xA;&#xA;&#34;&#39;So we need an ability to test high energy density systems somewhere that don&#39;t threaten the biosphere, but still allow us to develop them,&#39; said Howe, who thinks the moon would make a good testing base. &#39;And if something goes wrong, you melted a piece of the moon,&#39; and not Earth, he added.&#34;&#xA;&#xA;Swell.&#xA;&#xA;More here.&#xA;&#xA;#research #space #weapons&#xA;&#xA;]]&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>“Just one gram of antimatter could generate an explosion equivalent to a nuclear bomb. It&#39;s that kind of energy, some say, that could boldly take us where no one has gone before at record speed.”</p>

<p>It could also—and, if history has taught us anything, probably will—do other things.</p>

<p>“An antimatter engine could theoretically accelerate a spacecraft at 1g (9.8 meters per second squared) getting us to Proxima in just five years... That&#39;s 8,000 times faster than it would take Voyager 1 — one of the fastest spacecraft in history — to travel about half the distance, according to NASA.</p>

<p>“Even within our own solar system, an antimatter-powered spacecraft could reach Pluto in 3.5 weeks compared to the 9.5 years it took NASA&#39;s New Horizons probe to arrive.</p>

<p>“The engine system would first gather high-energy positrons from krypton-79 and then direct them toward a layer of regular matter, producing annihilation energy.”</p>

<p><em>Annihilation</em> energy.</p>

<p>But apparently, this is all in fact pretty old science:</p>

<p>“In 1953, Austrian physicist Eugen Sänger proposed a “photon rocket” that would run on positron annihilation energy.”</p>

<p>The hurdle seems to be: (a) Funding, and (b) Testing. Regarding the latter, one has to be very careful where to go about testing “annihilation” energy apparently. One scientist has a remarkably bright idea though:</p>

<p>”&#39;So we need an ability to test high energy density systems somewhere that don&#39;t threaten the biosphere, but still allow us to develop them,&#39; said Howe, who thinks the moon would make a good testing base. &#39;And if something goes wrong, you melted a piece of the moon,&#39; and not Earth, he added.”</p>

<p>Swell.</p>

<p><a href="https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/technology/how-antimatter-engines-could-fly-humans-to-other-stars-in-just-a-few-years/ar-BB1iIvo0?ocid=msedgntp&amp;pc=SMTS&amp;cvid=c3e3936756854433a89546f28fdd1b37&amp;ei=24">More here</a>.</p>

<p><a href="https://ganzeer.today/tag:research" class="hashtag"><span>#</span><span class="p-category">research</span></a> <a href="https://ganzeer.today/tag:space" class="hashtag"><span>#</span><span class="p-category">space</span></a> <a href="https://ganzeer.today/tag:weapons" class="hashtag"><span>#</span><span class="p-category">weapons</span></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
      <guid>https://ganzeer.today/antimatter-engine</guid>
      <pubDate>Fri, 23 Feb 2024 15:17:56 +0000</pubDate>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>